In the first place, it is not easy to translate objective indicators into social experiences. What does the drop of a few points in the Gini coefficient in a country entail? Does it necessarily imply improvements in the living conditions of the poorest or, as Juan Pablo Pérez Sáinz has lucidly warned, can it simply reflect a transfer of income from mobile phone number list the elite to the upper middle sectors, without impact on the lower income sectors?4? There was, moreover, an improvement in the distribution between individuals and households, but not great changes in the partition between capital and labor, and it is also true that the poorest improved their situation, mobile phone number list but the richest became even richer.
It should also be considered that as the economy and GDP per capita grew, the relative fraction of income of each group was greater in real terms than mobile phone number list in more restrictive contexts, that is: the "cake" grew, for which the portions were unequal, of course, but also “big” for everyone. In any case, there is a pending task for the social sciences: that of carrying out a sort of «translation» of a wide range of indicators with divergent signs into concrete mobile phone number list experiences and living conditions.
For their part, the data on health, education or mobile phone number list housing improved in absolute terms, the "well-being floors" increased and almost all countries, groups, classes and regions experienced improvements in the period. However, in many cases the gaps did not decrease. And this because the most favored countries, subnational regions and groups have advanced more than the poorest countries and the most disadvantaged groups and areas.